.FAVORITES OF 2009

February 1st, 2010

1207163011452_2vicky-cristina-barcelona-m_507_278

****** FRANKSFILMS FAVORITES OF 2009 ******

I know what you’re thinking.  You’re thinking, “Frank. You haven’t been posting, probably because you’re no longer interested in movies and stopped watching them.  Why do you hate movies???”

Well, you’re wrong!

In fact, I have logged more than 260 movies in 2009.  I know this because I’ve kept a list (Yes.  I am that guy who makes lists), and I keep this list so that I don’t watch the same bad, forgetable movies over and over again (because I’ve forgotten that I already saw them).  And as I do each year,  I’d like to summarize my favorites to recommend to you.  These are the films that I would have posted recommendations have I not been so lazy all year.  I won’t make excuses for not making regular post, but will only promise to “try” to do better in 2010.

FIRST: the disclaimers

  • These are not necessarily films that were released in 2009. They are the movies that I watched (usually for the first time) in 2009.  Also, many of the very best movies of 2009 are not yet out on video and so I haven’t seen them yet.  Hey! I can’t see all the films at the cinema. Besides, my local cinema doesn’t show the very best films – only the most hyped up ones. 
  • This is also why my best of 2009 list doesn’t look like the OSCAR Award or the BAFTA Award or the Golden Globe Awards.  As of this writing, I haven’t yet seen many of those films.
  • My idea of the best movies may not be the same as yours – in fact, I guarantee it. However, this is my site, not yours. So if you’re wondering why Beerfest is not on this list – that’s why.
  • For the most part, I’m avoiding the wide release movies. Everybody already knows about these. So, if you loved say, Iron Man, and wonder why it’s not on my list – that’s why ……………….even though the movie was TOTALLY awesific!
  • I have listed the films in order, although, in truth, they’re all equally good.
  • That’s it!

 

SECOND:  the Categories

FAVORITE MOVIES:

  1. LET THE RIGHT ONE IN (Swedish) – 12 year old, Oskar, the only child of divorced parents, is a loner.  He’s bullied by the ….er, well, bullies at school.  He has no outlet for his aggressions except to stab at the tree outside his appartment with a pocket knife.  He also has no friends until he meets Eli, the new girl next door.  She’s also 12 – but she’s been 12 for a very long time.  For my money, this is the best vampire film in living memory, and considering the proliferation of movies and TV shows about the undead, that’s saying a lot.   It’s quiet and atmospheric and romantic and desolate and haunting  and beautiful ………and bloody – let’s not forget about bloody.  As of this writing, IMDB Top 250: #202, tomatometer: 97%
  2. WATCHMEN (English) – This is the superhero movie for grown-ups.  It takes a very uncomprimising look at costumed heroes and the consequences of their actions.   The characters include one honest to god superhero, who is so powerful that he has lost all sense of humanity, and a array of regular folks who may offer no more than a good left hook and a big gun, and who may span various degrees of morality.  Gone are all the usual rules of behavior (like Batman or Spiderman) about hurting or killing or sex.  In fact, they were considered so dangerous that, prior to the start of the story, even the public turned against them and the government outlawed them.    This frank trteatment of what was, in the past, considered sacred ground is what makes this film a must see.
  3. INGLORIOUS BASTERDS (English) - Quentin Tarantino rewrites World War 2 history in this darkly comic and excessively violent action thriller.   Featuring Brad Pitt as the leader of a group of Jewish American who’s mission is to spread fear throughout the Third Reich by scalping and brutally killing Nazis – and Christoph Waltz, in an Oscar worthy performance, as the SS Jew-Hunter.  Throw in an immensely suspenseful screenplay and a scheme that’s so crazy it just has to work and you’ve got the most fun of any WW2 movie.   IMDB Top 250: #69, tomatometer: 89%.
  4. VICKY CRISTINA BARCELONA (English) – The best Woody Allen movie in years.  If you want to see what a romantic comedy should be, see this!  It’s beautiful and sumptuous, and yet light and satisfying – go figure.  tomatometer: 82%
  5. RACHEL GETTING MARRIED (English) – Anne Hathaway has finally shed the Disney Girl image and grown up with an adult dark dramady.  On leave from rehab, she returns for her sister’s wedding.  The weekend is jam packed with family angst and conflict, as well as resolution as Anne’s character deals with her sister’s happiness and her lack of it.  As dramatic as that sounds, it really is rather funny for the most part.  tomatometer: 86%.

 

DOCUMENTARIES

  1. ANVIL: THE STORY OF ANVIL - This is like This is Spinal Tap, except this is real.  Bandmates, and best friends, try to relive Anvil’s glory days by staging one last big comeback tour.  Never will you have routed for two people on a failed mission more than in this documentary.  You’ll almost want it bad enough to go out and buy their albums ………..that’s ‘almost’.  Definitely the best and funest documentary of the year.  tomatometer: 98%.
  2. MAN ON WIRE - In 1974, a tightrope walker walked a wire across the sky between the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York.  This sort of thing is highly illegal and the authorities tend to discourage such behavior.  A documentary about this feat may not sound too exciting past, say, 10 minutes or so – but it is!  I mean, you just don’t sneak a rope in your pocket and ride up the elevator and toss it across to the other side.  Tons of support equipment had to be brought up, and set up – all without anyone catching on.  the whole story about how it was done is as suspenseful as any action thriller.  tomatometer: 100%.
  3. RELIGULOUS - Apologies if you take your religion seriously.  But if you don’t – or if you do and need to be taken down a peg or two – here is satiric look at the various religions of thew world from a skeptic’s (Bill Maher) point of view.  Nobody gets special treatment and nobody gets left out.  It’s not meant to convert everyone to atheism (atheism also gets the treatment), but to make you think about what you believe and why.
  4. IT MIGHT GET LOUD - Three prominent rock musicians Jimmy Page, The Edge, and Jack White get together to discuss their approach to the electric guitar and it’s place in rock history.  Fascinating if you are a musician as it give insight into a musician’s relationship with his instrument.  Also interesting if you are a rock fan as it gives some background into the making of some of your favorite music.   IT MIGHT GET LOUD isn’t just the title.
  5. SHINE A LIGHT - Martin Scorsese directs an electrifying concert of the Rolling Stones and friends.  Mick and Keith look impossibly old and yet give an energetic performance that you know they’re going to pay for the next day.  Helped out by Christina Aguilera, Buddy Guy, and Jack White, this is a treat if you’re a  fan – less so if you’re not.  tomatometer: 86%.

FUNNIEST MOVIES

  1. HAMLET 2 - High school drama teacher gets his department cancelled and decides to take his students off campus to put on his new musical, a sequel to Hamlet.  Although everybody dies at the end of the original, a plot twist, in the form of a time machine, fixes that.  Along for the ride are Einstein, and Hilary Clinton, and Jesus …and Elisabeth Shue (as Elisabeth Shue).  The level of political incorrectness of the two main songs, which makes The Producer’s “Springtime for Hitler” look like a church hymn, is part of what makes this the funniest movie of the year.
  2. PINEAPPLE EXPRESS - Stoner logic dictates that 1) stoners will get hungry and eat – a lot; 2) stoners will have conversations that defy conventional logic – except to other stoners;  3) stoners (when stoned) can never get seriously or permanently injured;  4) stoners will eventually stumble their way into saving the day; and 5) stoners know how to roll one hell of a bone!  Sounds like a one-joke movie, but it’s not!  It’s at least ten jokes and they’re all funny as hell!
  3. THE HANGOVER - A group of men take their friend to Vegas for a bachelor party.  When they wake up in the morning, the groom is missing and no one can remember anything from the night before.  I know what you’re thinking – it’s the same plot as Dude, Where’s my Car - but THAT was funny too.  Step by improbable step they uncover clues from the previous night.  Can they solve the mystery and find the groom and get him to the wedding on time?  
  4. ZACK AND MIRI MAKE A PORNO - Kevin Smith (Clerks, Chasing Amy, Dogma) wrote and directed this comedy about two platonic friends who decide to make a porno as way out of their financial crisis.  Not as pornagraphic as the name suggests, in fact it’s rather sweet, but the humor may not be for everyone, especially if you’re offended by that sort of thing. 

FEEL-GOOD MOVIE

  1. THE VISITOR - (English) I was told long ago that a good story involves a character ungoing a change.  That would make THE VISITOR a good story indeed.  Walter, an aging widowed college professor, leads a very lonely and boring life.  When he travels to manhatten to attend a conference, he finds that squatters are living in his appartment.  He takes pity on them and lets them stay with him, and in so doing, begins his life transformation.  Beautifully written and acted, was nominated for an Oscar for best actor for 2007, and was a huge hit on the film festival circuit.  You’ve never heard of it?  Don’t get me started on that.   tomatometer: 96%
  2. THE BAND’S VISIT - (Mostly English) Based on a true story, the premise of this film sounds like a disaster which would probably lead to a huge violent cataclysmic climax – but it’s not.  When a small Egyptian police orchestra flies from Egypt to Israel to perform at the opening of an Arab culture center, they are left stranded at the airport.  With confusing directions and a poor grasp on the language, they get terribly lost and they are left standing by the side of the road near a quiet desert town.   Although separated by culture and language, the townspeople take them in and thus begins life at its best.  THE BAND’S VISIT is funny, lonely, inspiring, sad ,romantic, and beautiful all at once. tomatometer: 100%
  3. HAPPY-GO-LUCKY - (English) Did you ever have one of those boxes with a button that you press that plays a recorded laugh track?  I makes you laugh along with it even though there’s nothing to laugh at.  That’s because laughing is infectuous.  In that same way, you’ll feel happy and upbeat with the character, Poppy, played by Sally Hawkins (Golden Globe: best actress - 2009).  She is so happy and cheerfully optimistic that those around her don’t know what to make of her.  It may sound like a one-note movie but it’s not.  It’s smart and funny and WILL make you smile.  tomatometer: 100%
  4. IRINA PALM - (English) Marianne Faithfull (if you’re my age, you’ll remember her as the pop singer from the late 60’s that used to hang around with the Rolling Stones) plays a grandmother, desperate to raise money for her grandson’s medical treatment.  When she responds to an ad for “hostess” in a London shop called “Sexy World”, she has found her calling, and is given the name “Irina Palm”.  I know it might sound offensive, but it never becomes sordid or profane.  Witty and funny, this is a real feel-good movie that you wouldn’t hesitate to recommend to your own grandmother. 

 

HORROR

  1. DRAG ME TO HELL - I like horror movies to scare the crap out of me.  I want to be afraid of the dark or afraid of being alone or afraid of other people.  If a horror movie isn’t going to do that – then I want it to be smart and funny.  This movie is in the later category.  Sam Raimi, harkening back to his Evil Dead and Army of Darkness days, serves up an amusing tale of a young girl fighting off a witches curse.  It doesn’t matter that it’s not bloody and gory like most horror films, nor does it matter that you can predict the ending a mile off.  It’s a fun time at the movies and that’s all there is to it.   tomatometer: 92%   
  2. PARANORMAL ACTIVITY - This one DID scare the crap out of me.  Not right away, but days later when I’d have time to let the images ferment a little.  This is exactly what you want to see when the ghost hunter crews on TV tell you to look into the dark corner because something moved there but the cameras mysteriously didn’t catch it.  However, I did learn some practical advice from this film:  1) don’t bring a Ouiji board into a ahunted house;  2) if you are being threatened by unseen demons, invite over as many people as possible to watch over you; 3) if you are being threatened by unseen demons, you do not have it all under control; and,  4)  if you are being threatened by unseen demons, don’t tell them to “bring it on wussys – is that all you got?!”   tomatometer: 91% 
  3. THE DESCENT - A group of young women spelunkers (cave explorers) descend into a cave (“The Descent”, get it?), and also descend into madness and craziness (subtle difference between the two).  Cave-ins and cave dwellers abound.  What depths will they go to to survive?  Action-packed edge of your seat thriller.   tomatometer: 84%
  4. SUICIDE CLUB - As with many Japanese films of this genre, it’s not so much scary as it is disturbing.   Groups of teens across Japan are suddenly commiting suicide in rather gruesome ways.  Why?  That’s the mystery that needs solving.  This is a rather difficult film to watch and not for the faint of heart. 

ROMANCE

  1. (500) DAYS OF SUMMER - This is a unique love story that chronicles a relationship that lasts exactly 500 days.  We know right from the opening scene that they break up, so no surprises there.  In an interesting twist, the scenes don’t follow in order so that we might see day:317 then see day:14, so that we get these glimpses of days near the end and immediately follow with a happy scene of them flirting with each other.  That way, you’re kept off balance and interested.   Summer is a young woman who doesn’t believe true love exists and Tom knows for a fact that it does because he has just fallen into it.  Let’s face it – they’re doomed!  IMDB Top 250: 227,   tomatometer: 87%
  2. THE GIRL ON THE BRIDGE - (French) A woman jumps to her death from a bridge in Paris into the Seine River and is saved by a man who whisks her off to be his new assistant in his knife throwing act (the position had been recently vacated).  As her tells her, she can’t be any worse off than she is now.  They soon form an emotional and mystical telepathic link whick benefits their act.  Although their relationship is not yet physical, their attaction cannot be denied  and even the act of knife throwing becomes an erotic substitute.  Funny and romantic.    tomatometer: 92%
  3. 3-IRON - (just a little Korean) This is a strange and unique little film.  A young man likes to break into other people’s homes while they’re away and spend a few days living their lives.  He doesn’t steal anything and he always cleans up after himself, fixes things that are broken, and generally leaves the place better than he found it.  In one particular house, unknown to him, the man’s wife has stayed behind.  She doesn’t call the police or confront him but, curious, at first  just watches him.  There is a definite psoitive and inevitable bond that grows between them as the story goes on.  The film is Korean, however there is absolutely no dialog between the two main characters – there is no need for dialog.    
  4. LAST CHANCE HARVEY - A romance for grown-ups.  Harvey is a man who must have been a real bastard at one time.  He’s arrived in town to attend his daughter’s wedding and neither she or his ex-wife or anyone else for that matter want to see him there.  As he’s sitting in the airport lounge deciding if he should just leave and make everybody happy, he meets Kate.  Kate has no history with him, so that he can just be himself.  They gradually become more drawn to each other as the movie progresses and Harveyt sees one last chance for love. 
  5. PAPER HEART - Partly scripted and part documentary, comedienne Charlyne Yi embarks across country to find the meaning of love.  Along the way, she might just find out.  This is just about the cutest, sweetest, most refreshing romantic documentary I’ve ever seen (…..and yes, it may be the ONLY romantic documentary I’ve ever seen.). 

SCI-FI

  1. WATCHMEN - I’ve already described this film in the ’Favorite Movie’ category, but in terms of sci-fi, it’s also exceedingly good.  It does the best job of showing an alternate history of any other sci-fi movie of recent times.  The story takes place in 1985 and the film shows how 1985 might have looked if the events in the story actually took place.  It does it in a seamless and logical way that enhances the believability factor while you’re watching. 
  2. DISTRICT 9 - Best – sci-fi screenplay – ever!  The story takes place in the present day in which 20+ years ago, an alien spaceship appeared over Johannesburg, South Africa, stranding about a million sick and starving giant shrimp-like creatures looking for a place to live.  This not-too-subtle allegory of Apartied, told in a documentary-type style, is cool and funny, smart and provocative, intense, thrilling and sad, and has a feel-good satisfying ending.   IMDB Top 250: #108, tomatometer: 90%
  3. STAR TREK (2009) - Exactly what the series needed.  With redefining the characters, the film manages to offer new insights into the origins and early days of it’s crew.  It’s as new and fresh now as the original series was when it first aired in the 60’s.  An ‘E’ ride.   IMDB Top 250: #147 tomatometer: 94% 

FILMS THAT DEFY DESCRIPTION

  1. SYNECDOCHE, NEW YORK - If there is one thing you can say about Charlie Kaufman screenplays, it’s that they’re NOT ORDINARY.  He has a way of showing you the real world by taking you totally out of it.  In this film he explores a common theme of a story about a story within a story within another story about a story …. This may take you more than one viewing.
  2. BRAND UPON THE BRAIN! - Canadian filmaker, Guy Madden, makes movies that nobody else has the gall to make (as evident by my past recommendation The Saddest Music in the World).  He has lately been experimenting with (somewhat) silent films, giving both the look and the feel of a film made in, say, the 1920’s.  It’s a bizarre specticle to be sure but you can’t look away.  Narrated throughout by Isabella Rossellini.  To say that this is a unique cinematic experience would be selling it short.  tomatometer: 94%   
  3. GOZU - (Japanese) I’m not sure what to say about this one.  It really does defy explanation.  The IMDB website for this film lists the following among the plot elements: violence, breast milk, Yakuza, supernatural, cow head, and transvestism.    Yep -  that sounds about right.
  4. A ZED AND TWO NOUGHTS - You really don’t need to know what this movie is about, however Peter Greenaway’s films are always out of the ordinary and visually interesting – although for some, ‘visually interesting’ may translate to ‘difficult to watch’. 
  5. BIG MAN JAPAN - Holy crap!  Apparently, Tokyo is so often attacked by monsters that the government has retained the services of a hero who, when needed, can be transformed into a giant man to combat them.  In the true “Hancock” sense, he can often do more harm than good. 
  6. MISTER LONELY - I can’t describe it but I can give you the rough premise.  In Paris, a Michael Jackson impersonator meets a Marilyn Monroe impersonators who takes him to her commune in Scotland, populated entirely with celebrity impersonators.  You take it from there.

WORST MOVIE  (don’t watch any of these movies, I beg of you)

  1. S.DARKO: A DONNIE DARKO TALE
  2. DANIKA
  3. LAURE
  4. THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL (2008)

 

So that’s it for 2009.   Here’s wishing you all Happy Movie-watching for 2010.  May this be the best movie year ever!

LET THE RIGHT ONE IN

October 27th, 2009

right-one-2

This week’s movie:
LET THE RIGHT ONE IN

F@#k  “Twilight“! ….and their offspring!

You know what I’m talking about.  That sappy, so-called vampire movie that all the tween and young teenage girls are going gaga over.  “Isn’t he just dreamy”, and “Isn’t it cool to be a vampire?”  “I wish I was a vampire – it’s soooooo romantic.” – piece of crap excuse to sell merchandising.

I blame “Buffy, the Vampire Slayer” and the whole Buffy/Angel on-again, off-again romantic subplot.  It spelled doom for the show and film makers should have taken notice.  I blame the “Underworld” series for glorifying vampires as an organized society of bad-ass erotic uber-mench – and who wouldn’t want to be part of that world, especially if Kate Beckinsale is a member.  I blame Lost Boys because, after all, wasn’t it pretty much the same plot?  I blame Interview With the Vampire and all the other Anne Rice Novels for making the vampire life look so cool (lest you think I’m wrong, Interview With the Vampire featured Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, and Antonio Banderas).

Movie-wise, vampires really needed a fast kick in the fangs .  The last good creative and interesting vampire film was Francis Ford Coppola’s  Bram Stoker’s Dracula, with Gary Oldman.  It did a lot of interesting little things with subtle visual effects.  HBO’s True Blood isn’t a great vampire story, but it does pose some interesting concepts, plus it is slick and sexy and funny and what else can you ask for in a TV series?

LET THE RIGHT ONE IN may be perhaps the best vampire movie in a long long time.  Many of the RottenTomatoes film critics certainly think so, leading to a score of 98% on the tomatometer.  And they’re not the only ones.  Here are just a few samples from the many reviews:

“THIS IS A VAMPIRE MOVIE LIKE NO OTHER. MESMERIZING.” – Newsweek

“A SPECTACULARLY MOVING AND ELEGANT FILM THAT IS, AT THIS POINT, THE BEST MOVIE OF THE YEAR.” – Washington Post

“ONE OF THE YEAR’S VERY BEST MOVIES. A FUNNY, HAUNTING DAZZLER.” – Vogue

“A SPECTRALLY BEAUTIFUL VAMPIRE FILM” – New York Times

“BEST. VAMPIRE MOVIE. EVER.” – Washington Examiner

“IT’S A WINNER! … SEE IT NOW BEFORE A HOLLYWOOD REMAKE RUINS IT.” – Rolling Stone

“…THE BEST OF THE YEAR AND ONE OF THE MOST ORIGINAL AND HAUNTING VAMPIRE FILMS EVER MADE.” – Gwinnett Daily Post

“QUITE EASILY THE MOST COMPELLING NEW ENTRY IN VAMPIRE MYTHOS IN AS LONG AS I CAN REMEMBER.” – Twitch.com

etc……  It seem to be on everybody’s “Best of …” list.  Then why is it that you’ve never heard of it???  The truth is, some of the best, most innovative, most entertaining, most intelligent movies ever made – ever will be made – you’ll never hear about.  Why?  How do you find out about movies?  You might see them advertised on TV.  You might go see a movie at the theater and see previews before the feature film.  You might even call the hot line at your local cineplex and find out what’s playing.  If this is how you do it, then you’ll never find out about the best films.  The local cineplexes are franchises that are owned by large corporations.  They select to be shown only movies that their marketing guys tell them will sell the most tickets.  They base this judgment on where the film was made (Hollywood studio vs Independent studio), big named actors, primary language (foreign language films – nobody wants to see those), and how much money has been spent on TV and magazine advertising – and has absolutely NO bearing on how good the film is.  That’s why movies like Daddy Day Camp (tomatometer score: 1% No, that’s not a typo – that’s ONE percent) made it to the theaters and this week’s film (tomatometer 98%) did not.

….and THAT’S why you need someone like ME to tell you what you’re missing!

The vampire in the film is a young girl named Eli.  She tells her friend Oskar that, like him, she is 12 years old – but unlike him, she has been 12 years old for a very long time.  Eli is probably the most enigmatic and tragic vampires in filmdom.  She is perpetually 12 years old, frozen in time, you might say, in that incredibly painful period of post-childhood, pre-adolescence.  She has been around for a long time and you might think that she would relate better to her adult caretaker, but she’s still basically a kid and so she feels more comfortable with Oskar.  She sees candy and knows she can’t eat it, but she can remember a time when she could.  She’s old but can never grow up.  As fascinating as she is, Eli is not the main character.  The story is told through the point of view of Oskar.  He is lonely.  His parents have split and he lives with his mother, who has little time for him.  His town is cold and bleak as the frozen landscape.  He is bullied by the kids at school.  He takes some of his rage out on inanimate objects and suppresses the rest – until he meets Eli.

I don’t want to give you the impression that this a revenge movie.  He doesn’t enlist his new vampire friend to get back at his tormentors, and he doesn’t sneak his father’s gun into school and start taking his rage out on animate objects.  Instead, he begins caring less about that because the focus of his life is now changed. The one good thing in his life now is his friendship with Eli (and vice versa).  The focus of the whole film, in fact, is the relationship between the two leads and less about killing and the drinking of blood.  Not that there isn’t killing and the drinking of blood – there is – it is a vampire movie, after all.  It’s just that those things are rather matter of fact.

In an ordinary vampire film, the two leads would have a steamy romance, but considering that they’re 12 years old, let’s be thankful that they don’t.  Instead, there is a tender friendship and the promise of possible romance in the years ahead (if they survive that long) – but we know  it can never be because Eli will always be 12 years old.  Besides, who has sex with a vampire?  Really!  They’re all cold and dead and stuff – eewwww!

In an ordinary vampire film, Van Helsing would corner the vampire with a crucifix and the townspeople would drive a stake through her heart, but let’s face it – if it were that easy to kill a vampire, Eli would never have survived the first hundred years or so.  In an ordinary vampire film, Eli would turn into a bat and fly off.  Now this brings up an interesting point.  If you turn ,say your typical 180 lb. vampire into say, a typical 1 lb. bat, what happens to the remaining 179 lbs of vampire that doesn’t fit into the bat?  Makes you think, don’t it?

As of this writing, there are devious plans in the making of an English language Hollywood version of this movie.  Don’t wait for it!  It’ll suck!  It always does!  See the original (It’s in Swedish with subtitles in various languages.  Additionally, there is an English language soundtrack that’s not too bad, if you don’t want to read subtitles) – this is the version that has won such critical acclaim and for good reason.  The remake will be quickly forgotten.

One thing to note.  When the DVD was first released in the US, the distribution company (Magnolia films) messed up the English subtitles (Why they didn’t just use the subtitles from the original DVD, I’ll never know).  These subtitles were “dumbed down” a great deal for American audiences.  long passages were reduced to a few words and some were left out altogether.  In the ensuing furor, Magnolia Films agreed to re-release the DVD with corrected subtitles – however, I have been unable to find any of the “good” ones.  When you go to rent, look for the words “Theatrical Version” after “English Subtitles” on the back of the box.  If not, I suggest selecting the English soundtrack.

Halloween is fast approaching, and in the tradition of the holiday, people like to watch scary movies.  So I’ve delved into my collection and came up with my own suggestions for Halloween viewing.  So put in your DVD orders, make the popcorn, put the lights down low and sit real close together because these have a high squirm factor.

  1. LET THE RIGHT ONE IN – it is, after all, this week’s featured film.
  2. The Changeling – This old fashioned ghost story is still one of the creepiest films ever made.
  3. Paranormal Activity – As of this writing, you’ll have to go to the theater to see this one – but this movie is scaring everybody.
  4. Drag Me To Hell – I resisted seeing this for a long time and wish I hadn’t.  This is a great scary/funny film from Sam Raimi.
  5. Audition - On a creepy scale from 1 to 10, this movie is a 15!  A must-see for Halloween.
  6. Shaun of the Dead – If you have to include a zombie movie, why not a good one (funny too).
  7. Little Otik – Holy crap!  This is creepy.
  8. May - A crazy girl + a creepy doll + knives = Freaky movie that you just know isn’t going to end well.
  9. Army of Darkness: Ash, from the Evil Dead movies, is transported to the 1300’s to fight the army of the dead. It is perhaps the most quoted of all horror movies.
  10. Three Extremes: A collection of three 40 min. stories from three different Asian horror masters. These guys know how to push the right buttons on the creepy meter.

I never understood how Halloween (all souls day) became associated with ghosts and zombies and vampires – but since it does, queue up this week’s movie LET THE RIGHT ONE IN
….and enjoy.

see the trailer.

REEL ILLUSIONARY ZONE

October 20th, 2009

l_7f8cd5537f0c4ebd95c6e3398212b793

REEL-ILLUSIONARY ZONE

They all laughed at Edison, and even at Einstein.

There is a genre of film that many of you, probably most of you, possibly all of you will never see.  “Is it the foreign language film?”, you ask.  Close! but not what I had in mind.  “Is it the Japanese Cowboy movie?”, you suggest.  Good guess, but again, not what I was thinking.  “Surely, you must mean the War Horror Musical?”, you ask.  No, I believe there’ll be War Horror Musicals in theaters by Spring.  No, no no – I’m talking about the “experimental” film.

Many of our most creative film makers have made these experimental “art house” films early in their career.  These generally don’t tell a conventional narrative in the traditional sense.  Instead, they are often a project in which a film maker is trying out some idea or technique.  For example: Suppose I just got a new fish-eye lens.  I might say to myself, “I wonder what would happen if I filmed a doorway to a building with people walking in and out.  But then, very 5 minutes or so, I rotated the lens 15 degrees, so that after half an hour, the image is on its side – and after an hour, the picture is upside down, etc.  Boy, wouldn’t that be cool!”  Now, I might show my film to the public to find out what they think, and they might say that the picture on its side or upside down looked stupid, but at about 15 to 30 degrees, it caused a sense of uneasiness and tension.  So now when I go to make my “real” movie, and I want the viewer to feel tension or uneasy, I’ll rotate my lens 15 degrees ,so that the picture is slanted.

Art House films are not only about experimenting with technique, although there is usually some of that in nearly every one, the film maker may also have an unusual idea that he wants to pursue.  Perhaps it’s an adventure story with a cast made up entirely of trees (damn!  that’s a great idea!).  Whatever the idea, whatever the reason, the film maker needs to get it out on film (or tape – or hard drive – or flash memory).  There is almost never any budget for this kind of project so these films tend to be pretty spare.  This is good, because it forces film makers to be creative.  If you ever get to see experimental films, don’t expect to see the kind of film normally shown in theaters.  They’re not like that.  One cannot use the same basis of comparison or rating that we use for traditional films.  Art House films are not “good” or “bad” in the same way that traditional films are good or bad.  I guess you could say that Art House films are the modern art paintings of the film world.  They’re not for everybody.  Plenty of people will look at a Pollack and say, “It’s just paint thrown onto a canvas.”  It’s meant to bypass all traditional points of reference and allow you to look directly into the artist’s mind.

This week’s film REEL-ILLUSIONARY ZONE, from Reel Groovy Films, written and directed by John Hartman, is such a film.  Don’t expect to see it advertised on TV.  Don’t expect to see the trailer shown before “High School Musical 9″.  Don’t expect to see it shown at your local cinema multiplex, or even at the local independent film theater (there aren’t any near me, but I’ve heard rumors of their existence).  In fact, the only way to see this film at this time, is during special showings by the film makers (click the link to see upcoming schedules)  or by ordering the dvd (check for availability) directly from Reel-Groovy Films.  I met director John Hartman and producer “Z” of Unfolding Story Pictures at a special showing of another of their collaborations, Bridge Crusader (more about this in a future posting).  I was so impressed with their obvious commitment, excitement, and dedication that I agreed to screen and review REEL-ILLUSIONARY ZONE.  Of course, having been distracted by the exotic dancers, I probably would have agreed to anything.

The movie:  As an experiment, techniques both in cinematography and in storytelling are being explored here.

The cinematography is spectacular.  Hartman uses an ancient super 8mm hand-held camera with film (yes – actual film) to produce a color palette that is deep and rich.  He uses other techniques, such as  shooting through filters and skewed viewing angles to produce, sometime bizarre effects, and give the illusion of an old silent film.  Stop-action photography give rise to special effects not possible in the silent film era.  Although there is no spoken dialog, the film is not silent, featuring sound effects and an music original soundtrack.

The story itself centers on a toy maker who toys rebel and head for the real world.  Without any prior experiences, they must somehow safely navigate this bizarre world, with funny and frightening consequences.  Simultaneously whimsical and dark, it compares favorably with the works of other experimental film makers, such as Jan Svankmajer, Maya Deren, Guy Maddin, and David Lynch.  These film makers, not only made experimental films early in their careers, but are still making  them today (except for Maya Deren who died in 1961 when her brain exploded because she couldn’t get her ideas out and onto film fast enough).

REEL-ILLUSIONARY ZONE is not an easy film to find, it’s not an easy film to watch.  It disconnects the brain from common film-viewing reference points and makes you work for it.  It assaults your sense of sight and hearing, as well as your sense of reason.   But it should be seen.  You might like it or you might not.  You might think it’s a masterpiece of film making, or you might think it’s just paint flung onto a canvas …..but you should at least see it.

I’ve been thinking lately about making my own experimental film.  In my case, they would HAVE to be experimental because I really don’t know how to make a film, but I do have some ideas that I wanted to share with you.

  1. A 15 minute short in which I film the camera that I use to film the camera.  I doesn’t really ‘do’ anything, hence it’s only a short.  If the camera actually had moving parts, well …..there’d be a feature film in that.
  2. FranksFilms – the Movie!
  3. A film about my daily life – except that every 5 minutes, I would lean an additional 15 degrees to the left.   So that after half an hour, I would be lying on my side – and after an hour, I would be upside down.  There would be a time (at about 15 – 30 degrees) where I would feel an uneasy tension, and throw up.
  4. In the spirit of going with upcoming trends, a War Horror Musical in which WWII Nazi zombies do “Grease”.
  5. As an homage to David Lynch, a documentary which just replays the lesbian scene from Mulholland Drive ….over and over and over …..
  6. FranksFilms – the Movie!  Really!  I mean, really.  Doesn’t that have a great ring to it???
  7. A re-telling of the Joan of Arc story with a cast made up entirely of  potted plants.  Not just flowers but herbs too, and perhaps vegetables as well.  Really, it’s just a metaphor for ……… er, for ……….er, well, I’m still trying to work that one out.
  8. An avant-garde film that totally bucks the Hollywood system.  It’ll be so avant-garde that it won’t hit one false note, will not succumb to commercial influence,  will be for its own sake and will not pander to any audience.  It will be so avant-garde, that it won’t even show the theaters.  It’ll be so avant-garde, that it won’t ever make it to dvd.  In fact, I won’t even film it – that’s how avant-garde it will be.
  9. A time-lapse motion picture that follows a laptop computer booting up Windows 7 for the first time, until the day it crashes for the final time.  That’s a lot of crash/reboot sequences.
  10. Silent films have no sound.  How about a film that has sound but no video!  Yes – I know they used to do exactly that back in the days of radio – but my “film” would play in cinemas.  The next step would be a 3D version ……….in IMAX!!!!!

REEL-ILLUSIONARY ZONE
How adventurous are you?
Enjoy

IN BRUGES

May 24th, 2009

This week’s movie:

IN BRUGES

I’ve been told that I need to use more metaphor.

I don’t know why.  Should I take this to mean that my discussions have, in the past, been perhaps too literal?  I don’t think that’s true but, then again, it’s hard for me to be objective.  So, I thought I’d try an experiment.  I will offer three separate discussions of this week’s video recommendation, IN BRUGES.  The first one will be perfectly literal – or as perfectly literal as I can manage.  In the second review, I will give my “normal” observations on the film.  You can then judge how similar the first and second are.  If they are indistinct, then I am being too literal and need to to use more metaphors.  In the third version, I will offer an intentionally metaphorical discussion.  It will be symbolic and make you think and it may have separate meanings depending on how you read into it or, if you read aloud, the inflection of your own voice, or the time of day, or what the meaning of “is” is.

So here goes.

The Literal Version.

This week’s movie, IN BRUGES (wherever that is) played in theaters and is now available on DVD, although not yet on Blu-ray (as of this writing – but probably by now since it won a Golden Globe Award).  It is 107 minutes long.  It stars Colin Farrell, Brendan Gleeson, and Ralph Fiennes – who all give very fine performances …..sorry, I digress.  Um ……………….it’s in color.  It’s about hit men who are hiding out in Bruges (wherever that is) after a job goes down wrong, and what they do while they’re there, and what the gang boss decides to do about them……… Locations include Bruges (wherever that is) and a little bit of somewhere in England.  Props include guns, tour books, um………….clothes, and um ……..a dwarf, and um………. I’m sorry, but everything else seems to be subject to interpretation.  Oh wait – as of this writing, IN BRUGES has made the IMDB Top 250 at #203, between The Conversation and Anatomy of a Murder, and won a best actor Golden Globe award for Colin Farrell.  That’s it.

I

The FranksFilms version.

This movie shouldn’t be funny, but it is.  It’s about hit men who do horrendous things for a living.  In fact, they’re hiding out because one of them, Colin Farrell’s character, has mistakingly killed an innocent bystander and the climate is about to get very hot.  They’re banished by their boss to hide out in Bruges. “Where the f#@k is Bruges?”, he asks.  (Admit it!  You were thinking that too.)  It shouldn’t be funny – but it is.  Very much so.

We shouldn’t like these guys, after all they’re killers – but we do.  So, why DO we like them?  Why is it easy to disassociate them from what they do?  The answer is – because they’re funny, they make us laugh.  How is this possible, you ask.  We do it all the time.  The truth is that we all use humor to relieve stress.  In fact, that is its main purpose.  You can take the most horrendous situation and inject a little humor, and suddenly it’s funny.  We tend not to dwell on the terrible, and instead, focus on the light and humorous.

I think I first encountered this phenomenon in James Bond films.  Bond would be dancing will a beautiful woman when he’d see an assassin reflected in her eyes.  He’d swing her around so that she’d take the bullet – and we’d all gasp.  But when he’d dump her lifeless body on a chair and remark to an onlooker, “She’s dead tired.”  we’d all laugh.  See, he made a joke.

Consider the following scenario.  Two men walk into a theater an make a gruesome discovery – everybody is dead.  Not just dead, but hacked up and blown apart and strewn all over the place.  Blood and guts and pieces cover every surface.  Men, women, and children, and pets – yes pets too – have been killed in terrible ways.  The scene is terrible beyond comprehension.  The carnage – Oh, the carnage!  But, let’s suppose that one of the men accidentally slips on some wayward entrails and falls on his butt.  Dang! he says, I just had these pants dry cleaned.  I would be willing to bet that 999 out of 1000 people would laugh (you would too – admit it).  Don’t think badly of yourself if you laugh – you can’t help it – it’s human nature.

Hence the hit men in this film are funny.

Colin Farrel’s character is especially complex.  He has done something terrible and he feels guilty and ashamed.  On the other hand, he’e a wisecracking wise guy (that’s doubly wise) that can’t help getting into trouble – which is NOT the kind of thing you want when you’re trying to lay low.  He’s impatient and can’t appreciate the abundant beauty the city has to offer.  He does, however, appreciate the abundant ‘beauties’ the city has to offer.  Again, just the kind of thing you don’t do when you’re trying to lay low.

The film is a well crafted balance between serious drama, wisecracking wisecracks, real friendship between the two men ( the young rookie and the seasoned pro), a burgeoning romance, and just a touch of absurdity.  Absurdity, however, cranks into overdrive in the final reel when mob boss, Ralph Fiennes, finally shows up to give his most over-the-top and perhaps his funniest performance.  This film is sure to please as it has all of the prerequisite elements: hitmen, tour books, mobsters, pretty girls, guns, bullets,  drugs, and dwarves – and, of course, there’s Bruges itself – wherever the f#@k that is.

I realize that all this talk about Bruges will probably make all of you want to vacation there – so, as a public service, I give you these TEN TOP THINGS TO DO IN BRUGES WHILE YOU’RE HIDING FROM THE LAW:

  1. Study some of the Gothic architecture.
  2. Study some Gothic Goths hanging out in front of aforesaid architecture.
  3. Boat tour along the canals.
  4. Bet on the boat races along the canals.  if you’re a true criminal, you’d rig the races …..along the canals  …….amid the aforesaid architecture.
  5. Tour the historic windmills.
  6. Drink the historic ale in the Gothic beer pubs.
  7. (From “Great Railtours of Europe”) “….take Hoogstraat to Langestraat and keep going to Kruisport.”  I don’t even know HOW to joke about this.
  8. Visit Flanders Fields.
  9. Bury a couple bodies in Flanders Fields.
  10. Get a feel for some local color.  The aforesaid Gothic architecture is gray; the previously mentioned canal water is …….er, gray; the railroad trains are ….er, gray;  the aforesaid historic beer pubs are gray; the Gothic Goths wear gray; the sky is gray; the dead bodies buried in Flanders Fields are gray (after a while); the lederhosen are gray.  Maybe seeing some red bloodshed wouldn’t be so bad after all.

You don’t have to go to Bruges to watch IN BRUGES.

Enjoy.

…..and finally,

The Metaphor version

The crow caws!

watch trailer


WATCHMEN

March 19th, 2009

mailgooglecom

This week’s movie:
WATCHMEN

I’m breaking my own rule – twice.

Firstly, since this is a ‘video recommendation’ site, I shouldn’t recommending a movie that’s not yet been released on video ………..but I am. If it helps, you can think of it as a video that you have to go over to your “friend’s house” to watch. You know that friend who’s house is that big building in the center of town, with the big marquee,  and he always has lots of your neighbors over, and treats you with enormous buckets of popcorn and soda ……except that you have to pay him.

Secondly, I usually try to stay away from recommending the highly publicized big budget films – but I occassionally make an exception. I figure that, by now you’ve all heard about WATCHMEN, and if you’ve not read the novel, are trying to decide what the hell this is all about. The question you need to answer is “Will I like this movie?”  The answer is, although it helps, you don’t necessarily have to be a comic book geek like me.  But if you are, and are a fan of the novel, well it’s, as my friend Amanda puts it, “…an all out nerd-gasm in awesome town.”

The novel was written and the story takes place in 1985.  The material was considered very ’subversive for the time, ……mostly because it dealt with the cold war and nuclear war politics and stuff.  Some critics of the film (idiot bastards!) claim that times have changed and the material is not as subversive today and has lost some of it’s edge.  These people just don’t understand what the story is about.  The movie is called WATCHMEN for goodness sake, not COLD WAR.

The reason why this film is subversive, why it’s unlike any other super hero movie, can be summed up in one sentence:  Batman will never, ever kill The Joker!

Batman will never kill The Joker, not in 60 years of the comic books, not in the next million years.  He won’t, even though not doing so will lead to the death of many many innocent people, and also to several of the main characters.  Why can’t he do it?  It’s the code – the damn superhero code!  Batman is the hero.  He’s the good guy.  He can’t behave like the bad guys or he loses his identity.  Batman may operate outside the law, but he does obey it, and so he won’t kill The Joker, Spiderman won’t kill Venom, and Superman won’t kill Lex Luthor – even when he knows he’ll always come back and cause great destruction and cost many lives.  They’re heroes and refrain from going down that dark path where killing your enemies gets easier and easier, and soon your enemies are anyone that riles you just a little.

However, real heroes aren’t like that.  Real heroes are imperfect.   Real heroes also take the responsibility of making the hard decisions.   Imagine real people putting on costumes to fight crime (they’re called ‘policemen’) – some with morals, and some without.  Imagine a Batman who decides that it’s his responsibility to make sure the Joker never kills again.  It would be so easy to do it ….if you decided that ridding the world of a dangerous menace was worth a run-in with the law.  Now, imagine Superman, a guy with actual super powers – he’s all-powerful and indestructible.  How is it possible for him to actually relate empathically to humans.  It’s not that hard to imagine that after a while he becomes detached to the point that he no longer cares for humanity (humans, animals, insects – they’re all the same to Him) – or worse, that He should rule the Earth and woe to anyone who defies Him.  If you can imagine all this, then you might be prepared for WATCHMEN.

One of the best sequences occurs near the beginning of the film which shows a montage of historical images.  Most of these images are recognizable because they have become iconic, but all are slightly different because of the existence of costumed superheroes.  This lets the viewer “get up to speed” on the history of superheroes in America.  Oh, and by the way, they’re not really super.  They all, except one, don’t have powers – they’re just ordinary Joe’s ,dressed up in a costumes, that know how to fight and sometimes carry a gun (You know ………like policemen.).

A couple of facts.  Most people consider a graphic novel just an over-sized comic book.  Nevertheless,  the graphic novel on which this movie is based, appears on Time Magazine’s list of the 100 best books of all time.  Similarly, it is the only graphic novel to appear in the BBC’s “Big Read”, an equivalent list of 100 all time best books.  As of this writing, WATCHMEN appears at #239 in the IMDB top 250 and climbing.

So, my recommendation:  SEE IT!  ….but before you rush out to the theater, heed the following warnings!

  1. Not for the squeamish!  ….or the Amish!
  2. It’s a visually breath-taking film.  Take extra oxygen when you go to the theater.  Concession stand oxygen is highway robbery!
  3. It’s big, it’s blue.  If it bothers you ……hahahahahahaha……that rhymes.
  4. If you have a chance to see it in IMAX, spend the extra few dollars.  It’ll be well worth it.  It’s bigger in IMAX.
  5. It’s very very violent.  Then again, so are Saturday morning cartoons.
  6. There are no pirates!   …………ARRRRRRGGGGG!
  7. The movie is long, almost three hours.  Who’s going to feed your cat while you’re out?
  8. There’s nudity.  Yeah ………super hero nudity is the BEST nudity.
  9. Why are there no pirates???!!!!
  10. The original graphic novel did NOT carry the Comics Book Code approval.  My God!!  what manner of gruesome depravity are we talking about here?

I just found out that the pirates are getting their own short film, to be released soon on DVD, called Tales of the Black Freighter …………..and you thought I was kidding about the pirates.

Who watches the Watchmen?  It should be you.

Enjoy.

watch trailer

BEST OF 2008

February 8th, 2009

****** BEST OF 2008 ******

I know this is coming a bit late. It’s February, for goodness sake. But late is better than never, I always say – or, at least, I always say since this morning. I realize that by now you’ve put 2008 well behind you and possibly don’t want to be reminded of it – but for myself, I just can’t seem to get back into the rhythm of regular posts until I get this one out. Perhaps you can just consider this to be a whole bunch of film recommendations all in one go.

So you might ask, “Frank, you haven’t been publishing much lately. Haven’t you been watching any movies?” The fact is that I have been watching movies (205 last year – and I’m on track for even more this year), I just haven’t been moved recently to write anything about them. It’s hard! It’s hard to come up with interesting takes on films that you like. There’s only so many times you can say that a movie is “fresh” or “unusual” or “unlike any film you’re likely to see this year” or “exactly what a movie should be”, without getting a little repetitive. I have to give the guys who do this for a living a lot of credit. I’m considering making up a new vocabulary (e.g. an awesome and terrific = awesific). Let’s give it a go, shall we?

FIRST: the disclaimers

  • These are not necessarily films that were released in 2008. They are the movies that I watched (usually for the first time) in 2008. Hey! I’ve got a day job and can’t see all the films at the cinema. Besides, my local cinema doesn’t show the very best films – only the most promoted ones.
  • This is also why my best of 2008 list doesn’t look like the OSCAR Award or the BAFTA Award nominations. As of this writing, I haven’t yet seen any of those films.
  • My idea of the best movies may not be the same as yours – in fact, I guarantee it. However, this is my site, not yours. So if you’re wondering why Beerfest is not on this list – that’s why.
  • For the most part, I’m avoiding the wide release movies. Everybody already knows about these. So, if you loved say, Iron Man, and wonder why it’s not on my list – that’s why ……………….even though the movie was TOTALLY awesific!
  • I have listed the films in order, although, in truth, they’re all equally good.
  • That’s it!

SECOND: the films

  1. THE DARK KNIGHT: (English) I know it’s a big budget film, but it was simply the most verawesrific (very-awsesome-&-terrific) film of the year, and not simply because of Heath Ledger’s performance (which was incredumous to say the least) but because of the screenplay and the direction. I admit that I’m a big fan of Christopher Nolan – ever since Memento.  Batman is always best when he’s played dark as opposed to campy.  I liked all the little moral dilemmas posed throughout the film in which either decision is the wrong one.  If you haven’t seen it yet, it is available on DVD.  Don’t let the fact that it’s based on a comic book convince you that it’s strictly for kids – it’s not.  As of this writing, IMDB top 250: #4tomatometer: 94%.
  2. NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN: (English) Our hero, the poor schmuck, stumbles upon a drug deal gone bad.  Of course he doesn’t know that for certain, but the fact that everyone is dead and that the drugs and the money are still there is strong evidence.  He takes the money.  The mob boss hires a tracker to find whoever took his money and get it back, hence setting up the conflict of the story.  There is no doubt that the tracker will eventually catch up with him.  He is relentless.  He is ruthless.  He is unstoppable as the tide.  He is perhaps the most unforgettable character in the Coen Brothers portfolio.  As of this writing, IMDB top 250: #97, and tomatometer: 94%.
  3. IN BRUGES: (English) One of the all-time great buddy films.  A young hit man botches a job and he and his partner are sent off to Bruges to hide out until the heat cools down.  This dark comedy makes you care about these guys, and even though they’re killers by trade, you really hope that things work out for them.  Rife with profanity – almost to the point of absurdity.  This film didn’t play in wide release so you’re not likely to have heard of it – but it is available on DVD.  As of this writing, IMDB top 250: #209, and tomatometer: 81%.
  4. JUNO: (English) You probably have heard of this film.  A young teenage girl finds herself pregnant and spends the ensuing months trying to find a good couple to adopt her baby.  It’s witty and funny and smart, in other words, it’s smartiphilic.  …..and I’m pretty sure it inspired a number of pregnancy pacts at high schools around the US.  The moral: don’t get pregnant, watch JUNO instead.  Scores a 100% on the tomatometer.
  5. ATONEMENT: (English) Beautifully filmed adaptation of the novel by Ian McEwan.  Keira Knightley’s little sister, in a jealous fit, initates a sequence of events that affects three lives over the course of the story.  Will she ever find atonement for what happened?  Boasts one of the most difficult and breathtaking sequences ever filmed all in one long unbroken shot.

THIRD: the extras

TIED FOR 6th PLACE: (no particular order)
THERE WILL BE BLOOD: (English) A virtuoso performance by Daniel Day-Lewis as a crazed and ruthless prospecter in the early pioneering days of the oil industry.   The film does a good job of capturing the greed, danger and excitement of oil drilling.  A war of will between Lewis and a local preacher dominates the arc of the story.  As of this writing, IMDB top 250: #114, and tomatoemeter: 94%.

THE DIVING BELL AND THE BUTTERFLY: (French) The inspiring true story of Elle editor Jean-Dominique Bauby who suffers a stroke and has to live with an almost totally paralyzed body.  He can only blink one eye, yet he was able, with the help of his nurse, to write his memoirs, on which the film is based.  I find it a tributr to the human spirit that though almost entirely paralyzed, he was still able to use his one good eye to look down the front of his nurses blouse.  As of this writing, IMDB top 250: #202, and tomatometer: 94%.

FUNNIEST MOVIE OF THE YEAR:
WALK HARD: THE DEWY COX STORY: (English) Chronicles the life and career of a Johnny Cash / Ray Charles / Brian Wilson / BobDylan – type character.  Could also have listed it as a musical, but it definitely belongs here.

Runner up: TROPIC THUNDER: Funniest ensemble cast, and filled with irreverent humor.  The cast of a war movie, filming on location, find themselves in a real war but don’t quite realize it.

FAMILY MOVIE OF THE YEAR
WALL-E: It’s really hard to beat Pixar, but these days nobody does it better. Much darker than most past films, the first 40 min or so is completely without dialog.  IMDb top 250: #35, and tomatometer: 97%.

Runner up: MR. MAGORIUM’S WONDER EMPORIUM: Dustin Hoffman, Natalie Portman, and a magic toy shop.  Not everybody liked, but I did.  It conveys wonder and imagination and an atmosphere reminiscent of the much malligned TOYS

DARK MOVIE OF THE YEAR
BEFORE THE DEVIL KNOWS YOU’RE DEAD: (English) Two brother, each in need of money plan a robbery of a jewelry store.  It doesn’t go well.

Runner up: TEETH: (English) A teenage girl discovers that she has sharp pointy teeth in an orifice other than her mouth, to the dismay of several boys and her gynecologist.

SCI-FI/FANTASY MOVIE OF THE YEAR
SUNSHINE: (English) A team of scientists travel to try to reignite a dying sun.  Sounds like a bad sequel to The Core, but was directed by Danny Boyle (of this year’s Slumdog Millionaire) and deserves a watch.  Totally unbelievable, but that’s hardly the point, is it? 

Runner up: CLOVERFIELD: (English) A big ol’ monster attacks New York.  The interesting bit here is that the entire film is what is seen by a witness holding a hand-held camcorder, while he and his friends try to survive.

STRANGEST DAMN MOVIE OF THE YEAR
BLACK SHEEP: (English) Something has happened to turn the sheep population of New Zealand into murderous predators. Played for laughs, but still………

Runner up: FIDO: (English) The world had been threatened by brain-eating zombies, but humanity triumphed in the end.  Now, what to do with the surviving zombies.  Put them to work, of course!  Hilarity ensues.

Honorable mention: ZOMBIE STRIPPERS: (English) The name pretty much says it all.  Not for the squeamish.  …..but funny as hell.

QUIRKY MOVIE OF THE YEAR;
WRISTCUTTERS: A LOVE STORY: (English) Strange, funny, and allegorical film about a group of suicides, trying to navigate the afterlife..

Runner up: LARS AND THE REAL GIRL: (English) Feel good story of a troubled man doing what’s necessary to deal with life, and a town willing to do what’s necessary to help.  Then, of course, there’s Bianca.

DOCUMENTARY OF THE YEAR
THE KING OF KONG: A FISTFUL OF QUARTERS: (English) The unbelievable and vastly entertaining story about the world of championship competitive Donkey Kong.  – yeah, you heard me!

Runner up: THE REAL DIRT ON FARMER JOHN: (English) Real life is almost always more interesting than stuff that’s made up.  John Peterson, farmer, American character, hippie, hero.

BIGGEST DISAPPOINTMENT OF THE YEAR
THE RULES OF THE GAME: (French) I looked forward to seeing this film since it’s so highly acclaimed by so many film critics.  I couldn’t get though the first 30 minutes.  There was no one in this movie interesting enough to hold my attention longer than that.

LEAST AWESIFIC MOVIE OF THE YEAR:
CEMETERY MAN: (Italian) You’ve probably never heard of this movie. That’s okay! I saw it and it looked like just the sort of dark comedy I was looking for. Instead, it was truly wretched – it was not in the least awesific.

12 AND HOLDING

September 28th, 2008

This week’s movie:
12 AND HOLDING

I used to be smart once.

I have this theory that we are all born knowing everything. All the mysteries of the universe – the sum total of human knowledge PLUS everything humans have yet to discover – is all there right in our heads from birth. But because the human brain has a limited volume, any acquired experience must ultimately push something else out. The upshot of this is that the older we get, the more we experience, the stupider we become. Ironically, babies are just not physically equipped to deal with omniscience. They might, for example, understand that quarks spontaneously decay in a degenerate spin field, but believe that this just a trivial matter that must be obvious to everybody – and instead, content themselves to totally dominating every other human surrounding them.

Humans tend to peak around 12 or 13 years old – that is, until puberty hits and our bodies betray us – when the sudden influx of new information and priorities herald the exodus of every single other bit of useful data – leaving one in hormonal dufusity, instead of philosophical brilliance. Adults don’t understand children. We adults think that we are mentally superior – but the truth is that we just can’t comprehend the utter vastness of a child’s mind that is totally unencumbered by the details of the adult world. The adult world is is designed , from very first principles, to fill the mind with insignificant trivia in an effort to keep us from figuring out too much of the world because, after all, we’re at the age where if we knew too much, we would surely hurt ourselves.

Kids know better than to try to explain themselves to us. I can remember a time, I think I was maybe 10 or 11 years old, when I told my mother I didn’t want to go to school that day. She asked, “What’s the matter? Do you feel sick?” I thought about it for a second and replied, “Yes. Yes, I do.” I just somehow knew that she wouldn’t have understood if I told her that I had this idea for time travel and I needed a little uninterrupted time to work out the details. …..and I did it too! …..I just wish I could remember how it worked……

Children instinctively know what they need to do and do it. It often doesn’t make sense to adults but then, we are not as well-informed. For instance, I have a friend whose (then) 8-year-old son, Jeffery, had cut off all his hair with the kitchen shears. He then taped it all to the living room wall. When they asked him why he had done it, he just shrugged his head and mumbled, “I don’t know.” They thought he was brain damaged, but he’s not. Children just don’t bother to explain themselves to us – we just wouldn’t understand. Maybe the slight weight of his hair was applying just enough pressure on his brain to interfere with with his meditations and needed to rid himself of it to complete his journey of enlightenment …………..or maybe he was just brain damaged.

The 12-year-olds in this week’s (month’s) movie find themselves faced with a tragedy and have to find some way of dealing with it. They each do it in their own particular way, and although the adults don’t seem to understand any of it, the kids know what they need to do. And though each is different, they all have the same sort of logic, proven by the fact that they all see a resolution of one form or another.

It’s refreshing to see a film that portrays pre-adolescent characters in a realistic way, without reverting to Nancy Drew/Hardy Boys cleverness, or Disney-style cuteness. These children are not Hollywood stereotypes, they are not precocious, they’re not super-heroes, they’re not geniuses (except as mentioned above), they are undergoing changes that they themselves don’t understand.

In a Hollywood film, these kids would have to negotiate all the normal hazards normally facing your typical movie pre-teen. For example, they would have to put up with humiliating put-downs by the “cool” popular clique at school, tyrannical school principal, clueless parents, bullies in the neighborhood, and probably a pair of inept crooks. They would end up solving their problems by: making the cool clique a little less cool; detective work to expose the principal’s plan to skim school funds; make the cheerleading team by beating the team captain in the big competition; put on a musical; get the girl; stand down the bully by not backing down; set up booby traps that torment the crooks until they turn themselves in to the police; or maybe – all of the above. This stuff doesn’t happen in this film. Instead, they ………………well, I let you find out for yourselves.

I’ve been thinking a lot about my friend’s son Jeffrey, who cut off all his hair. I feel that if I can understand this behavior, I can maybe reawaken the lost memories of my own youth – or maybe of yesterday at least. So here are some possible …………

…….REASONS WHY JEFFEREY CUT OFF ALL HIS HAIR

  1. Needed to lose half an ounce of weight – the quick way.
  2. Watched a late-night showing of the film Westworld, with Yul Brenner, on cable.
  3. Wanted to convince himself that he, contrary to his parents’ accusations, was NOT the Antichrist, by checking his scalp for the tell-tale “666″. Fortunately, he found only a harmless “999″.
  4. Watched a late-night showing of the film The Magnificent Seven, with Yul Brenner, on cable.
  5. In order to save for a 10MeV magnetron, for his “Space Drive” experiments, he decided to cut down on extravagances, like shampoo.
  6. In an effort to stave off ecological disaster by global warming, cut off his hair and polished his scalp in order to increase the albedo of the Earth and reflect more light back into space. …..and it would have worked too if not for you meddling adults!
  7. Watched a late-night showing of The King and I, with Yul Brenner, on cable.
  8. Employed the following train of logic: Everything costs money; money is made of paper; paper is made from trees; trees grow in the forest; forests convert carbon dioxide in the atmosphere to oxygen; there are rain forests in South America; The Conquistadors explored South America looking for gold; there is money to be made in gold; everything costs money; wouldn’t it be a good idea to cut off all your hair and tape it to the wall?
  9. Watched a late-night showing of The Ten Commandments, with Yul Brenner, on cable.
  10. Step 1 in his “fuzzy wall” project.

Parent advisory: This film is rated R by the MPAA, which means that the young 12 year old stars cant legally go to see their own movie. The film portrays young children dealing with tragedy and changes within themselves in a very realistic and no-nonsense way. This often frightens off many adults who feel that children shouldn’t see such things – that is, until they have to go through it themselves. I, personally, didn’t find anything very disturbing about it, but if you have young children, you may want to preview the movie first and then decide if you want to watch it again with them.

Cut off all your hair and watch 12 AND HOLDING

enjoy.

watch the trailer

WALK HARD: THE DEWEY COX STORY

July 20th, 2008

This week’s movie:

WALK HARD: THE DEWEY COX STORY

No one eats poop in this movie!

I find that a good indicator of the quality of a comedy is whether or not anyone ends up eating poop. In a lesser comedy, one that’s not intrinsically very funny, the film-maker will try everything in the Porky’s / American Pie / National Lampoon bag-o-tricks – even if it doesn’t fit – to try to get you to laugh. It often works because they know it will stimulate a little dangley bit on the underside of the brain that causes you to find amusement in the stupidest things – it’s a cheap shot – they don’t even have to work for it. You’ll probably laugh because you can’t help it, but you’ll immediately regret having done so – it’s not really funny when you think about it, and it gets old very fast. It’s an old trick. The old vaudevillians were always trained that when the audience wasn’t responding – do a pratfall – they have to laugh, they can’t help it. What can I say, humans laugh at stupid stuff. Why else would people tune in to television every week to watch home movies of people falling down, or getting hit in the nads with a soccer ball, or getting a pie in the face? This week’s movie, WALK HARD: THE DEWEY COX STORY, is funny from the opening scene to the very last fade-to-black. You’ll laugh, guaranteed, but those laughs will have been earned the hard way – with clever dialog and sincere adherence to the story’s premise and material.

The film is a parody of music biopics like the Johnny Cash bio, Walk the Line, and the Ray Charles bio, Ray. These films are the obvious target material for parody, but it also includes references to Jim Morrison, Brian Wilson of the Beach Boys, Bob Dylan, and the Beatles. I’m sure you may recognize others. But this isn’t like the Wayan’s Brothers Scary Movie kind of parody or even like the Abrahams and Zucker Airplane or Naked Gun parodies. It doesn’t use topical references and slapstick to solicit laughs. It doesn’t have to. It is true to it’s source material in that it works entirely within the context of the story, in the correct time-line. For example, it doesn’t make references to Brittany Spears or Paris Hilton during the part of the story that takes place in the 60’s. They could have – and they could have gotten big laughs by doing that. The problem with that is that ten years from now, nobody will remember Brittany Spears or Paris Hilton and so the humor will have been lost. I suppose that you could also argue that in ten years, nobody will remember ‘Walk the Line’ or the other films that are being parodied here – but that’s okay, the movie works just as well on it’s own.

Judd Apatow and Co. have been very prolific lately with hits like The 40 Year Old Virgin, Superbad, Knocked Up, and Forgetting Sarah Marshall. WALK HARD is as funny as these others, but it’s a different kind of comedy. For one thing, it’s not as crude as those (this is a lie) and there’s also not much profanity (another lie), and it doesn’t have as many “adult” situations (big lie), it also doesn’t depict excessive drug use (big lie), and never once strays into the realm of bad taste (a whopper!). Okay, it’s lewd and raunchy and politically incorrect – but so what! this is an adult comedy, not intended for children. Adult comedy should not be dumbed down to please the censors or conservative “family values” groups. There are no family values in this movie – just funny bits. You can’t be afraid to laugh here – just go for it. You’ll still respect yourself in the morning.

DEWEY COX (lot’s of obvious fun made with the name) is a fictional character, but he might as well be real. He’s familiar enough to be Johnny Cash or Ray Charles (I know Ray is black – work with me here) or Bob Dylan or any other veteran of a VH1 “Behind the Music” special. It’s funny, not so much because of the jokes, but because of the familiarity. We recognize all of the traits because we’ve seen then before – we’ve grown up with them. They may be exaggerated in this film, but that just serves to underscore them more effectively. As a plus, all new songs were written for the film and are performed by the actors themselves, and you know what? They ain’t bad.

I keep saying that this movie is funny – but just how funny is it? Let me see if I can come up with some analogous levels of funny.

  1. This may seem a bit cliche, but if I said it was more fun than a barrel of monkeys, that’s saying a lot. I mean – think about it. Imagine a real barrel full of actual monkeys – how funny would that be! Let’s just downplay, for the moment, the fact that chimps eat their young. They could marmosets or macaques or how about howler monkeys – yes, a barrel of howler monkeys! Now, that’s what I call ‘funny’.
  2. I’m reminded of rotifers. Rotifers are a class of microscopic aquatic invertebrates. Despite their small size, they are the undisputed comedians of the undersea world. There’s an old rotifer joke that goes, “There are three rotifers in a row on the edge of a barnacle. The rotifer on the left spins its tentacles clockwise, drawing passing food into itself. The rotifer on the right spins its tentacles counter-clockwise. The rotifer in the middle can’t spin its tentacle either clockwise or counter-clockwise without entangling them with one of its neighbors. Instead, it repositions itself upside down and eats the barnacle. The left and right rotifers stare at their now bloated comrade and one comments – That’s what happens when you don’t exercise.” …………………………………………………………….Trust me. If you were a rotifer, you’d be rolling on the floor laughing right about now.
  3. Let’s consider a funny scenario. You are carrying a large pane of glass when you slip on a banana peel. Just at that moment, the participants of a high speed car chase intersect with you. You hit the ground and throw out your back. The cars shatter the glass showering you with pointy shards. The tires of the car grind them into your flesh. A bystander screams and accidentally overturns a produce cart, causing the fresh-cut lemons to roll in your direction, squirting fresh lemon juice into your wounds. Finally, a policeman comes up to you and hands you a citation with a heavy fine for 1) littering (broken glass), and 2) loitering. ………………………………………..okay – so maybe it wouldn’t seem that funny to you…………..
  4. If funny was a candy bar, The Jerk would be a Hershey bar with almonds. National Lampoon’s Animal House would be a Kit Kat bar. Clerks would be a Cadbury Egg (obscenely sweet). The dark comedy, American Psycho, is a Dove Extra Dark Chocolate bar. Stanley Kubrick’s, Dr. Strangelove, would be an exquisite Godiva Assortment. Any movie with Larry, the Cable Guy (I think he eats poop in most of his movies) would be practical joke chocolate – you know, the kind that looks like chocolate but is really a powerful laxative. In this context, this week’s film, WALK HARD: THE DEWEY COX STORY, is a Jaguar. I know it’s a car, but as much as I like chocolate, a Jaguar is still better than any candy bar.
  5. What is the funniest animal? Some say kittens or puppies because they make you laugh but that’s incorrect. The subtle difference is that kittens and puppies are cute, not funny. Another misconception is the Hyena, because “they’re so funny that they make themselves laugh”. The truth is, it’s not so much a laugh as a sneer. They think so highly of themselves that they constantly laughing smugly at the inferiority of others. They’re not at all funny and you just want to slap that stupid grin off their face. Dogs – you ask? No! Dogs eat poop, which means they’re trying way too hard and can’t think of anything funnier. Is it monkeys – no! Monkeys are only funny in a large group, as in “a barrel of howler monkeys”. A solitary monkey is rather sad and just a tad creepy. No, the funniest animals are the lemurs – heh heh, those guys……….
  6. What is the funniest country? Of course, one’s first impulse is to say “Turkey”, an unfortunate name. I mean, how can you take a country with a name like Turkey seriously? Or what about Greece (another unfortunate name)? ……and the really odd coincidence is that they’re right next to one another on the map. You would think that that would be a pretty funny part of the world, but no! Funny names do not funny countries, make. The funniest country is Madagascar. Why? Lemurs – heh heh, those guys…………………
  7. Oh, and by the way, when did clowns transition from funny into disturbing? When I was a kid, clowns were funny, period! Then slowly, over the years, they seem to be regarded more as creepy evil killers of children than the clowns I remember. I’m guilty of it too – but I don’t remember how it happened. Was it the film, Killer Klowns from Outer Space?, or was it Ronald McDonald, lackey of the evil corporate multinational mega-company, who alway struck me as someone who would eat small children if he had his way?
  8. What’s the funniest movies ever made? I suppose that’s an unfair question since everybody has a different sense of humor. But let’s suppose you think of your vote for the five funniest movies of all time. Leave a comment below and tell me what they are. Here are mine, today – if you ask me tomorrow, this list may be slightly different. In no particular order: Monty Python and the Holy Grail; Airplane; Clerks; This is Spinal Tap; Young Frankenstein; and South Park – Bigger, Longer & Uncut. Yes! Yes! I know that’s six! So sue me! SO what’s your five (or six)?
  9. SO, I almost forgot the point of #8. WALK HARD: THE DEWEY COX STORY is not on that list. It’s not one of the five (or six) funniest movies of all time – but it is the funniest movies I’ve seen so far this year – and I’ve seen quite a few.
  10. Finally, what’s the funniest category from above? Is it candy bars, or countries or animals or movies – or is it something else? Who cares? Funny is funny. Although it’s in short supply in a lot of the world, humans need comedy, we need to laugh. If we didn’t occasionally laugh ourselves silly or piss our pants and fall on the floor (heavy drinking produces the same result but is not a viable substitute), we would be sad and angry all the time until our innate urge to kill someone overcame our innate urge to just say f*** it.

WALK HARD: THE DEWEY COX STORY. Don’t pass up this really funny film – it may save someone’s life.

Enjoy

watch the trailer

CALLING FOR WORDS

June 29th, 2008

I’ve realized that the reason I can’t think of anything to write anymore is that I’ve run out of words. Or worse yet, I’ve overused the ones I had – There’s only so many times you can call a movie “quirky and funny” or say that the film maker “got it right” or that this is “the best movie of the year” – and get away with it. So, I’m in search for new words, but since the internet is one big world community, I’m asking you, the readers, to send me some new and interesting and “quirky” words that I can use in my next video recommendation. Simply click on the “Comments” link, at the bottom of this post, to leave your suggestions.

“….my computer has run out of t’s”

June 22nd, 2008

I suppose this happens to everybody at one time or another.

For reasons which i can’t explain, I seem to be in some kind of writing funk.  I can’t seem to come up with a single word to write ………….well – except these.  I think if I can get through this next article (coming soon), I’ll be OK.  So, be patient and I’ll get back into the swing of it in another week or so.  In the meantime, feel free to browse through the FranksFilms archive at past recommendations – good movies all around.