Archive for the ‘action’ Category

IN BRUGES

Sunday, May 24th, 2009

This week’s movie:

IN BRUGES

I’ve been told that I need to use more metaphor.

I don’t know why.  Should I take this to mean that my discussions have, in the past, been perhaps too literal?  I don’t think that’s true but, then again, it’s hard for me to be objective.  So, I thought I’d try an experiment.  I will offer three separate discussions of this week’s video recommendation, IN BRUGES.  The first one will be perfectly literal – or as perfectly literal as I can manage.  In the second review, I will give my “normal” observations on the film.  You can then judge how similar the first and second are.  If they are indistinct, then I am being too literal and need to to use more metaphors.  In the third version, I will offer an intentionally metaphorical discussion.  It will be symbolic and make you think and it may have separate meanings depending on how you read into it or, if you read aloud, the inflection of your own voice, or the time of day, or what the meaning of “is” is.

So here goes.

The Literal Version.

This week’s movie, IN BRUGES (wherever that is) played in theaters and is now available on DVD, although not yet on Blu-ray (as of this writing – but probably by now since it won a Golden Globe Award).  It is 107 minutes long.  It stars Colin Farrell, Brendan Gleeson, and Ralph Fiennes – who all give very fine performances …..sorry, I digress.  Um ……………….it’s in color.  It’s about hit men who are hiding out in Bruges (wherever that is) after a job goes down wrong, and what they do while they’re there, and what the gang boss decides to do about them……… Locations include Bruges (wherever that is) and a little bit of somewhere in England.  Props include guns, tour books, um………….clothes, and um ……..a dwarf, and um………. I’m sorry, but everything else seems to be subject to interpretation.  Oh wait – as of this writing, IN BRUGES has made the IMDB Top 250 at #203, between The Conversation and Anatomy of a Murder, and won a best actor Golden Globe award for Colin Farrell.  That’s it.

I

The FranksFilms version.

This movie shouldn’t be funny, but it is.  It’s about hit men who do horrendous things for a living.  In fact, they’re hiding out because one of them, Colin Farrell’s character, has mistakingly killed an innocent bystander and the climate is about to get very hot.  They’re banished by their boss to hide out in Bruges. “Where the f#@k is Bruges?”, he asks.  (Admit it!  You were thinking that too.)  It shouldn’t be funny – but it is.  Very much so.

We shouldn’t like these guys, after all they’re killers – but we do.  So, why DO we like them?  Why is it easy to disassociate them from what they do?  The answer is – because they’re funny, they make us laugh.  How is this possible, you ask.  We do it all the time.  The truth is that we all use humor to relieve stress.  In fact, that is its main purpose.  You can take the most horrendous situation and inject a little humor, and suddenly it’s funny.  We tend not to dwell on the terrible, and instead, focus on the light and humorous.

I think I first encountered this phenomenon in James Bond films.  Bond would be dancing will a beautiful woman when he’d see an assassin reflected in her eyes.  He’d swing her around so that she’d take the bullet – and we’d all gasp.  But when he’d dump her lifeless body on a chair and remark to an onlooker, “She’s dead tired.”  we’d all laugh.  See, he made a joke.

Consider the following scenario.  Two men walk into a theater an make a gruesome discovery – everybody is dead.  Not just dead, but hacked up and blown apart and strewn all over the place.  Blood and guts and pieces cover every surface.  Men, women, and children, and pets – yes pets too – have been killed in terrible ways.  The scene is terrible beyond comprehension.  The carnage – Oh, the carnage!  But, let’s suppose that one of the men accidentally slips on some wayward entrails and falls on his butt.  Dang! he says, I just had these pants dry cleaned.  I would be willing to bet that 999 out of 1000 people would laugh (you would too – admit it).  Don’t think badly of yourself if you laugh – you can’t help it – it’s human nature.

Hence the hit men in this film are funny.

Colin Farrel’s character is especially complex.  He has done something terrible and he feels guilty and ashamed.  On the other hand, he’e a wisecracking wise guy (that’s doubly wise) that can’t help getting into trouble – which is NOT the kind of thing you want when you’re trying to lay low.  He’s impatient and can’t appreciate the abundant beauty the city has to offer.  He does, however, appreciate the abundant ‘beauties’ the city has to offer.  Again, just the kind of thing you don’t do when you’re trying to lay low.

The film is a well crafted balance between serious drama, wisecracking wisecracks, real friendship between the two men ( the young rookie and the seasoned pro), a burgeoning romance, and just a touch of absurdity.  Absurdity, however, cranks into overdrive in the final reel when mob boss, Ralph Fiennes, finally shows up to give his most over-the-top and perhaps his funniest performance.  This film is sure to please as it has all of the prerequisite elements: hitmen, tour books, mobsters, pretty girls, guns, bullets,  drugs, and dwarves – and, of course, there’s Bruges itself – wherever the f#@k that is.

I realize that all this talk about Bruges will probably make all of you want to vacation there – so, as a public service, I give you these TEN TOP THINGS TO DO IN BRUGES WHILE YOU’RE HIDING FROM THE LAW:

  1. Study some of the Gothic architecture.
  2. Study some Gothic Goths hanging out in front of aforesaid architecture.
  3. Boat tour along the canals.
  4. Bet on the boat races along the canals.  if you’re a true criminal, you’d rig the races …..along the canals  …….amid the aforesaid architecture.
  5. Tour the historic windmills.
  6. Drink the historic ale in the Gothic beer pubs.
  7. (From “Great Railtours of Europe”) “….take Hoogstraat to Langestraat and keep going to Kruisport.”  I don’t even know HOW to joke about this.
  8. Visit Flanders Fields.
  9. Bury a couple bodies in Flanders Fields.
  10. Get a feel for some local color.  The aforesaid Gothic architecture is gray; the previously mentioned canal water is …….er, gray; the railroad trains are ….er, gray;  the aforesaid historic beer pubs are gray; the Gothic Goths wear gray; the sky is gray; the dead bodies buried in Flanders Fields are gray (after a while); the lederhosen are gray.  Maybe seeing some red bloodshed wouldn’t be so bad after all.

You don’t have to go to Bruges to watch IN BRUGES.

Enjoy.

…..and finally,

The Metaphor version

The crow caws!

watch trailer


WATCHMEN

Thursday, March 19th, 2009

mailgooglecom

This week’s movie:
WATCHMEN

I’m breaking my own rule – twice.

Firstly, since this is a ‘video recommendation’ site, I shouldn’t recommending a movie that’s not yet been released on video ………..but I am. If it helps, you can think of it as a video that you have to go over to your “friend’s house” to watch. You know that friend who’s house is that big building in the center of town, with the big marquee,  and he always has lots of your neighbors over, and treats you with enormous buckets of popcorn and soda ……except that you have to pay him.

Secondly, I usually try to stay away from recommending the highly publicized big budget films – but I occassionally make an exception. I figure that, by now you’ve all heard about WATCHMEN, and if you’ve not read the novel, are trying to decide what the hell this is all about. The question you need to answer is “Will I like this movie?”  The answer is, although it helps, you don’t necessarily have to be a comic book geek like me.  But if you are, and are a fan of the novel, well it’s, as my friend Amanda puts it, “…an all out nerd-gasm in awesome town.”

The novel was written and the story takes place in 1985.  The material was considered very ’subversive for the time, ……mostly because it dealt with the cold war and nuclear war politics and stuff.  Some critics of the film (idiot bastards!) claim that times have changed and the material is not as subversive today and has lost some of it’s edge.  These people just don’t understand what the story is about.  The movie is called WATCHMEN for goodness sake, not COLD WAR.

The reason why this film is subversive, why it’s unlike any other super hero movie, can be summed up in one sentence:  Batman will never, ever kill The Joker!

Batman will never kill The Joker, not in 60 years of the comic books, not in the next million years.  He won’t, even though not doing so will lead to the death of many many innocent people, and also to several of the main characters.  Why can’t he do it?  It’s the code – the damn superhero code!  Batman is the hero.  He’s the good guy.  He can’t behave like the bad guys or he loses his identity.  Batman may operate outside the law, but he does obey it, and so he won’t kill The Joker, Spiderman won’t kill Venom, and Superman won’t kill Lex Luthor – even when he knows he’ll always come back and cause great destruction and cost many lives.  They’re heroes and refrain from going down that dark path where killing your enemies gets easier and easier, and soon your enemies are anyone that riles you just a little.

However, real heroes aren’t like that.  Real heroes are imperfect.   Real heroes also take the responsibility of making the hard decisions.   Imagine real people putting on costumes to fight crime (they’re called ‘policemen’) – some with morals, and some without.  Imagine a Batman who decides that it’s his responsibility to make sure the Joker never kills again.  It would be so easy to do it ….if you decided that ridding the world of a dangerous menace was worth a run-in with the law.  Now, imagine Superman, a guy with actual super powers – he’s all-powerful and indestructible.  How is it possible for him to actually relate empathically to humans.  It’s not that hard to imagine that after a while he becomes detached to the point that he no longer cares for humanity (humans, animals, insects – they’re all the same to Him) – or worse, that He should rule the Earth and woe to anyone who defies Him.  If you can imagine all this, then you might be prepared for WATCHMEN.

One of the best sequences occurs near the beginning of the film which shows a montage of historical images.  Most of these images are recognizable because they have become iconic, but all are slightly different because of the existence of costumed superheroes.  This lets the viewer “get up to speed” on the history of superheroes in America.  Oh, and by the way, they’re not really super.  They all, except one, don’t have powers – they’re just ordinary Joe’s ,dressed up in a costumes, that know how to fight and sometimes carry a gun (You know ………like policemen.).

A couple of facts.  Most people consider a graphic novel just an over-sized comic book.  Nevertheless,  the graphic novel on which this movie is based, appears on Time Magazine’s list of the 100 best books of all time.  Similarly, it is the only graphic novel to appear in the BBC’s “Big Read”, an equivalent list of 100 all time best books.  As of this writing, WATCHMEN appears at #239 in the IMDB top 250 and climbing.

So, my recommendation:  SEE IT!  ….but before you rush out to the theater, heed the following warnings!

  1. Not for the squeamish!  ….or the Amish!
  2. It’s a visually breath-taking film.  Take extra oxygen when you go to the theater.  Concession stand oxygen is highway robbery!
  3. It’s big, it’s blue.  If it bothers you ……hahahahahahaha……that rhymes.
  4. If you have a chance to see it in IMAX, spend the extra few dollars.  It’ll be well worth it.  It’s bigger in IMAX.
  5. It’s very very violent.  Then again, so are Saturday morning cartoons.
  6. There are no pirates!   …………ARRRRRRGGGGG!
  7. The movie is long, almost three hours.  Who’s going to feed your cat while you’re out?
  8. There’s nudity.  Yeah ………super hero nudity is the BEST nudity.
  9. Why are there no pirates???!!!!
  10. The original graphic novel did NOT carry the Comics Book Code approval.  My God!!  what manner of gruesome depravity are we talking about here?

I just found out that the pirates are getting their own short film, to be released soon on DVD, called Tales of the Black Freighter …………..and you thought I was kidding about the pirates.

Who watches the Watchmen?  It should be you.

Enjoy.

watch trailer

KILL BILL, VOL.2

Monday, March 27th, 2006


From the Archive 8/19/2004
Movie of the week:
KILL BILL, Volume 2

Good movie-making. I recommended the first part wholeheartedly. Now you have to watch the rest of the story. Still filled with lots of movie references and inside jokes. But even if don’t get the inside jokes, there’s still plenty to like. I think the ultimate Kung Fu reference is the fact that they cast David Carradine as Bill.

I know what you’re wondering, after seeing Kill Bill, Vol.1, you’re probably asking, “will she ever kill Bill?” You’ll just have to watch to find out.

Enjoy

KILL BILL, VOL.1

Monday, March 20th, 2006


From the Archive 4/26/2004
KILL BILL, vol.1

Even if you don’t like Quentin Tarantino’s movies, you have to admit that they got style. This one is his best (and don’t be yelling “Resevoir Dogs” at me – this is the one).

It’s violent. But the violence is so absurd, you’ll be laughing at it 20 minutes into the flick. It’s clever and slick, as are most QT’s movies.

This film has an added benefit to those of you who have watched a Bruce Lee feature or two. There are lots of references to those old movies: the yellow track suit that Uma wears through most of the film; the soundtrack; plently of references to The Green Hornet; etc…

This is what movies should be: a good time.

Enjoy.